![]() Older versions the bug is originally reported on (I couldn't find a way toĬhecking on a machine without Memory swap file (re observation E).Ĭhecking bug database for existance of bugs mentioned in Observation A and D. ThereĬhecking the 5 scenarios on virtual machines, where memory can be set down to aĬhecking if the "paste before or after"-dialogue is newly added or exists in the On smaller machines (memorywise) the extreme memory used could beĬhecking bug database for reports on bad performance and/or memory usage. This has a devasting effect on performance and should be logged as a bug It ought to be simple to estimate the memory needed for copyingĪnother object, which already exists in the presentation and claim it in one First it is allocated in small chunks, which is timeĬonsuming. This could indicate that it's the machine's RAM-control, but Iĭon't know what happens when you press the X-button, and XP asks: it's not Eventually I killed it, and it was a slow death:Īround 3 minutes. However, on my machine Impress came back and seemed stable, but was Notice that niravce111 did get a crash on a machine withĥ04 Mb RAM. (with Firefox, Thunderbird and Windows explorer open too) was 945Mb. Minutes time, where Impress was unresponsive. Paste them through slide pane, using mouse operations. Observation E: Trying to go to extremes I selected all 25 slides to copy and Why is more memory needed to show right click menu ? Observation D: Memory seems to be allocated, no matter what the user activates. I wonder why there's waiting time on the other operations. ![]() Select before / after, with most waiting time on "select copy" and "select ![]() Operations: right mouse click | select copy | right mouse click | select paste | Meanwhile Impress was unresponsive.Īt around 25 slides the waiting time amounted to 2-3 minutes for each of the This resulted in minute-long waiting times, while CPU was running on 50% and Regrouping by selecting all objects on slide, grouping them, copy it, regroupingĪll again (in effect doubling the number of items in a group). Observation C: In order to try to crash Impress, I did some additional Slide cannot be regarded as an extreme case. Grouped with a group of 1 polygon, 1 textbox, 1 picture (?).īesides that there are 2 textboxes and a rectangle on the slide. Observation B: The test file contains a flag, which consists of (4 lines) In the slide pane, as otherwise the question is meaningless. That should only appear if you press paste while the mouse hovers over a slide Logical 'before' or 'after'.) and it's confusing, since you indicate a spaceīetween slides with the mouse in order to paste. This step is not documented in previous descriptions.Īnyway it is not adding value when you try to paste as last slide (there's no Observation A: When pasting a whole slide there's a step deciding to put the I have made these observations while checking: I haven't been able to crash impress by recreating any of these scenarios on #5: Copy + paste photos "sometimes" => crash. #4: Copy last slide in slide pane + paste it. #3: Copy whole slide+paste it (through right-click-menu using mouse). #2: Copy+paste an object more than once (2-3 times) => crash. #1: Copy the flag, paste it, copy an object (any) => crash. Summng previous comments on this issue it appears to have at least five ways ofīeing reproduced. If you have trouble getting bug then restart the computer and try the steps.Īll tests I've done was on Samsung NC10, 1 Gb memory, XP SP3. If I recover then impress opens but after doing the steps it crashed. If I decline to recover and after decline to save WRITER opens automatically. (max 10 attempts)It will show recovery window. ![]() Repeat step 2 and 3 respectively impress will crash after 2 to 5 attempt. Paste the slide in the slide pane by Right click of mouseĤ. Copy the slide in the slide pane by Right click of mouse(Copy the lastģ. Use the impress file attached by reporter.Ģ. Open Office version: OOo-dev 3.2x (codeline DEV300) Microsoft Windows XP Home edition version 2002 Service pack 2 I am writing here because bug is also reproducible on Windows XP so it’s a I am able to replicate the same bug successfully on Windows XP. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |